X Deactivates EU Commission's Ad Account After €120M Fine: The Battle Escalates
💰 The €120 Million Fine: What Happened?
On December 7, 2025, the European Commission dropped a bombshell by announcing the first-ever fine under the EU's Digital Services Act (DSA). The penalty targets X's controversial blue checkmark system and advertising transparency practices.
Fine Details:
- Amount: €120 million (approximately $140 million)
- First DSA enforcement action against a major platform
- Issued to X (formerly Twitter) on December 7, 2025
🔍 Why X Was Fined: The Core Violations
The European Commission identified two critical areas where X failed to comply with EU digital regulations:
1. Deceptive Blue Checkmark System
The Commission labeled X's paid verification system as "deceptive", arguing that it makes users vulnerable to:
- Impersonation: Anyone can purchase verification regardless of authenticity
- Scams: Bad actors can appear legitimate by simply paying for a checkmark
- User Confusion: The system undermines trust in verified accounts
2. Ad Transparency Failures
X's advertising repository was found to be non-compliant with DSA requirements:
- Lack of proper transparency in ad tracking
- Insufficient accessibility for regulatory oversight
- Failure to meet EU standards for advertising disclosure
Compliance Deadlines:
- 60 days to address blue checkmark concerns
- 90 days to fix ad transparency violations
- Risk of additional penalties if deadlines are missed
🔥 Elon Musk's Explosive Response
Never one to hold back, X owner Elon Musk immediately fired back at the European Commission with characteristic bluntness. His response included:
- Calling the fine "bullshit" in a public post
- Questioning the EU's future: "How long before the EU is gone? AbolishTheEU"
- Signaling strong resistance to EU regulatory authority
But Musk's words were just the beginning. X's retaliation took a more concrete form through direct action against the Commission's platform presence.
⚔️ X Strikes Back: Account Deactivation
In an unprecedented move, X terminated the European Commission's advertising account. However, the company claims this wasn't revenge for the fine but rather enforcement of platform rules.
The Accusations from X
Nikita Bier, X's Head of Product, accused the Commission of exploiting the platform's advertising system. According to Bier:
- The EC logged into a dormant ad account
- They exploited a flaw in X's Ad Composer tool
- The exploit created deceptive content that appeared as video
- This artificially boosted the post's reach
- The exploit had "never been abused like this" before
Bier emphasized X's commitment to equal treatment, stating: "X believes everyone should have an equal voice on our platform. However, it seems you believe that the rules should not apply to your account."
Following the account termination, X quickly patched the alleged exploit to prevent future abuse.
🇪🇺 European Commission's Defense
The European Commission firmly rejected X's accusations, maintaining they acted in good faith throughout the incident.
Official EC Statement Highlights:
- The Commission uses all social media platforms "in good faith"
- They only used tools provided by the platform itself (Post Composer)
- They expect platform tools to comply with terms and conditions
- All usage should align with EU legislative framework
Important Context
The Commission also revealed that they had suspended all paid advertising on X in October 2023—more than a year before this incident. That suspension remains in effect, raising questions about how a "dormant ad account" could have been used as X claims.
📊 What This Means for the Tech Industry
This confrontation represents more than just a dispute between one platform and one regulatory body—it signals a broader clash over digital governance.
Key Implications:
- Regulatory Precedent: First major DSA enforcement sets the tone for future actions
- Platform Power: X's ability to deactivate government accounts raises sovereignty questions
- Escalation Risk: Tit-for-tat actions could spiral into broader regulatory warfare
- Industry Impact: Other platforms are watching closely to gauge EU enforcement approach
🔮 What Happens Next?
Several critical developments could emerge from this standoff:
Potential Outcomes:
- Compliance Scenario: X meets the 60/90-day deadlines and implements required changes
- Escalation Scenario: Additional fines if X fails to comply, potentially reaching higher percentages of global revenue
- Legal Battle: X may challenge the fine in European courts
- Political Fallout: Increased tensions between US tech companies and EU regulators
💡 The Bigger Picture
This clash illuminates fundamental tensions in the digital age:
- Sovereignty vs. Platform Power: Can governments regulate platforms that can exclude them?
- Verification Systems: How should identity verification work in the social media era?
- Ad Transparency: What level of disclosure should platforms provide to regulators?
- Cross-Border Regulation: How do regional laws apply to global platforms?
🎯 The Takeaway
The battle between X and the European Commission marks a watershed moment in tech regulation. With €120 million on the line and both sides digging in, this conflict will likely shape how digital platforms interact with government authorities for years to come.
As compliance deadlines approach and the potential for additional penalties looms, the tech world watches to see whether compromise or further escalation defines the next chapter. One thing is certain: the relationship between big tech and European regulators has entered uncharted territory.
Stay tuned for updates as this story develops.
0 Comments