Amazon Plans to Replace 600,000 US Workers With Robots — Leaked Documents Reveal Automation Push
What the leaked documents say
According to the reporting, Amazon's robotics team is planning for a major expansion in automation. The documents reportedly outline goals to automate up to 75% of operations, and to eliminate roughly 160,000 US roles by 2027 that the company would otherwise need to staff.
How Amazon frames it (and their public response)
Amazon told reporters that the leaked documents reflect the perspective of one team and do not represent company-wide hiring strategy. A spokesperson emphasized Amazon is still hiring across operations — pointing to plans to staff seasonal roles and other openings.
“Leaked documents often paint an incomplete and misleading picture... thousands of documents circulate throughout the company at any given time.” — Amazon spokesperson (company comment on the leaked materials)
PR strategy and framing
Reporters say Amazon even discussed avoiding charged words like “automation” or “AI” in external messaging, preferring vague terms such as “advanced technology,” and using softer phrasing like “cobots” for robots that assist humans. The company reportedly considered community projects to soften potential backlash.
What experts warn
Some economists warn the consequences extend beyond Amazon. As noted by prominent academics, if such automation goals are achieved, a major employer could become a net job destroyer rather than a net creator — with ripple effects across supply chains and local labor markets.
“Nobody else has the same incentive as Amazon to find the way to automate. Once they work out how to do this profitably, it will spread to others, too.”
Why this matters: jobs, costs, and policy
- Worker impact: Potential large-scale displacement in warehousing, logistics, and fulfillment roles.
- Industry shift: Automation at Amazon could accelerate similar investments across retail and logistics.
- Policy pressure: The scale of possible job losses raises questions about retraining, social safety nets, and regulation.
Sources: Reporting based on interviews and internal strategy documents obtained by major news outlets; company responses where available. (Article content supplied by the user.)

0 Comments